Cryptopolitan
2026-05-25 12:08:31

Kalshi’s $454M Crypto Volume Week Marks Complete Reversal of Polymarket’s Early-2026 Lead

At the start of this year, Polymarket was the dominant prediction market platform when it came to crypto-themed event contracts. Across the two largest prediction markets right now, Polymarket dominated the market share here with 91.11% in the first week of January. Roughly five months later, this command has flipped almost entirely in Kalshi’s favour. In week ending May 17, data from Artemis shows that Kalshi drew in $454.2 million in weekly crypto-category spot volume (a new all-time high) versus Polymarket’s $297.1 million, a 60.45% to 39.55% split on a combined $751.3 million week. The tilt in volume dominance within this category has been noticeable since February, and with each passing week, Kalshi is seemingly tightening its grip. This is not a story about a platform building a better product per se. Kalshi’s crypto markets winning at the moment is the same reason why its sports category is outpacing its rival. The regulated in the U.S. angle is a major reason for this swing. To compound this, over the last quarter, Polymarket has faced various regulatory battles that haven’t helped their volumes as well. How the Share Inverted in Five Months Kalshi’s first foray into crypto-based event contracts with noticeable volume came in and around the third quarter of 2024. After reaching a market share of 37.85% in November 2024, their share remained relatively flat throughout 2025 and did not cross 25% dominance in this category. Looking at the Artemis chart, the trend broke around February this year and since then, weekly crypto spot volume has gone vertical for Kalshi. Polymarket, meanwhile, hasn’t lost volume in absolute terms, it’s just stopped growing. Holding $297M while Kalshi added an extra $400M of weekly turnover is the kind of stagnation that only looks bad in relative terms, and relative terms are what matters when you’re competing for the same liquidity. TRON, Coatue and the CNN/CNBC Push A few specific catalysts pulled the curve up. The TRON integration in December last year opened native USDT deposits directly into Kalshi accounts, which removed a big chunk of the friction that had previously pushed crypto-native traders toward Polymarket by default. The Coatue-led $1 billion raise at a $22 billion valuation then bankrolled an aggressive distribution push, with Kalshi event contracts now sitting inside Robinhood and WeBull where they’re being served to retail flow that has never touched a prediction market before. The CNN and CNBC partnerships added the final piece by giving Kalshi’s pricing a mainstream finance broadcast channel that Polymarket, as an offshore platform, structurally can’t match. Crypto markets on Kalshi are now quoted alongside equity products in places where retail discovers them passively, rather than having to seek them out. Polymarket’s Regulatory Quarter Did the Rest Polymarket has carried a much heavier regulatory load than Kalshi. The India block cut off a major user base, the Rhode Island AG suit added another state-level challenge, and even the shared blows, the House Oversight probe and the Ninth Circuit ruling on Nevada, land harder on a platform with offshore structure and a weaker US compliance posture. Each individually would be manageable. Stacked together, they create exactly the kind of jurisdictional uncertainty that pushes institutional and risk-averse retail volume toward the CFTC-regulated alternative sitting right next door. The 91% to 39% inversion lines up almost perfectly with this regulatory pressure window. Coincidence is possible, but the timing makes the cleaner explanation hard to ignore. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .

Crypto 뉴스 레터 받기
면책 조항 읽기 : 본 웹 사이트, 하이퍼 링크 사이트, 관련 응용 프로그램, 포럼, 블로그, 소셜 미디어 계정 및 기타 플랫폼 (이하 "사이트")에 제공된 모든 콘텐츠는 제 3 자 출처에서 구입 한 일반적인 정보 용입니다. 우리는 정확성과 업데이트 성을 포함하여 우리의 콘텐츠와 관련하여 어떠한 종류의 보증도하지 않습니다. 우리가 제공하는 컨텐츠의 어떤 부분도 금융 조언, 법률 자문 또는 기타 용도에 대한 귀하의 특정 신뢰를위한 다른 형태의 조언을 구성하지 않습니다. 당사 콘텐츠의 사용 또는 의존은 전적으로 귀하의 책임과 재량에 달려 있습니다. 당신은 그들에게 의존하기 전에 우리 자신의 연구를 수행하고, 검토하고, 분석하고, 검증해야합니다. 거래는 큰 손실로 이어질 수있는 매우 위험한 활동이므로 결정을 내리기 전에 재무 고문에게 문의하십시오. 본 사이트의 어떠한 콘텐츠도 모집 또는 제공을 목적으로하지 않습니다.