Summary Strategy is now a leveraged Bitcoin vehicle, not a software company, with risk amplified by debt and equity issuance. Q4 2025 results revealed a $12.4B net loss, driven by new fair value accounting and Bitcoin's 25–26% price drop, not operational weakness. Statistical analysis shows MSTR lacks long-term cointegration with Bitcoin but exhibits high short-term beta (1.36) and persistent volatility. I rate MSTR a strong sell—NAV premium is gone, dilution and financial stress loom, and direct BTC exposure is safer than MSTR’s structure. In recent years, Strategy ( MSTR ) became a Bitcoin ( BTC-USD ) wrapper in traditional markets. For many investors, this stock seemed like a good investment instrument if they believed in Bitcoin growth; you buy MSTR and get Bitcoin on steroids. But this narrative seems to be fading. The latest quarterly earnings (Q4 2025) were, in fact, a shock to me. Not because the company’s operations were bad—in fact, they were good—but the numbers showed how MSTR’s financial results are dependent on Bitcoin price swings. Immediately after earnings, I asked myself, why do investors pay a premium for difficult corporate structures if they can’t just buy Bitcoin themselves? At first glance, MSTR and BTC seem to be the same bet. But looking deeper into the structure, these assets are completely different, with different risk profiles and different behavior in critical phases. Earnings Yesterday, Strategy announced its Q4 2025 earnings , which I would say were pretty bad. But the majority of those negative numbers were caused by accounting rather than operational events. The company reported around $12.4 billion in net loss; GAAP EPS was -$42.93 per share, which did not beat analysts' expectations at all. However, these results are more connected to Bitcoin's price fall during the quarter than business problems. The main change was new fair value accounting rules application. According to them, Strategy must revalue its Bitcoin at market price. Bitcoin in Q4 2025 was falling; it fell around 25-26%, so the company naturally was forced to report around $17.5 billion in unrealized losses. As all traders like to joke, the losses are on paper - Strategy did not sell any Bitcoin. Operational side, which somehow is secondary for many investors, was stable. Software segment generated $123 million in revenue, a little beating market expectations. But these operations clearly do not impact valuation. Strategy today is valued almost as a Bitcoin exposure instrument. Besides BTC fall, Strategy was still aggressively buying bitcoin and increasing positions. Throughout 2025, they attracted more than $25 billion in capital, and in January 2026, they bought around 41k Bitcoin, making their overall portfolio above 700k BTC, with an average price around $76 thousand per Bitcoin. Given current BTC prices, they are underwater. Overall, let’s be real, the results show that the company is highly sensitive to Bitcoin price movements. These earnings are not a traditional business cycle example; they are a leveraged crypto exposure accounting result. Seeking Alpha Why MSTR is So Volatile? One of the main drivers of why Strategy's stock price is more sensitive to Bitcoin changes than Bitcoin itself is capital structure mechanics, which today are practically forming the company’s investment model. The strategy since 2020 is constant Bitcoin accumulation. For this goal, the company is using convertible bonds and new share issuance and sometimes even convertible preferred capital issuance. Convertible bonds let them attract capital cheaper than through traditional debt because investors are choosing potential conversion into shares if the share price rises. The majority of these bonds Strategy issued to finance Bitcoin accumulation and not for business expansion or operational activities. When they buy BTC with bond or share issuance money, Strategy increases Bitcoin amount in its balance, and that increases the Bitcoin per share ratio—the thing the company calls "Bitcoin Yield". This ratio shows how the amount of BTC per share increases over a certain period of time. In theory this is a value creation mechanism: more BTC per share means a larger initial position base. This type of model can create a positive cycle in a bull market. When Bitcoin price is rising, MSTR share price is going even higher due to a leverage-type effect, and that in turn allows them to raise even more capital through share issuance or bonds; then the money collected is reinvested into Bitcoin and increases the Bitcoin per share ratio. I think that this model was part of the overvaluation we saw MSTR being traded at a premium to NAV. At the same time, this model has the same effect in a bear market: share issuance and debt are increasing sensitivity to Bitcoin price. Any negative BTC movement is hitting MSTR even harder. Also, when premium is falling, choices like share issuance become less attractive, and the company needs to search for alternative financing sources or increase its debt. Also, let's keep this in mind: Bitcoin yield can increase BTC per share, but shareholders are still exposed to equity risks like leverage, dilution, timing, and now NAV multiple compression; it is not the same as buying BTC. That is why MSTR can diverge materially from BTC even if BTC per share goes up. MSTR vs BTC price comparison (TradingView) Statistical Analysis As I am primarily a trader and then an investor, I manage my risks through numbers - econometric analysis. So, to answer the question I asked in the beginning, I have quantified it. I have used dates since January 2024 till today (06/02/2026). The analysis was not oriented toward price narrative but more toward statistical structure. For those that are holding the bag, this might be a good part to understand how long or if you are going to be left holding the bag. First, I have done a stationarity test, which is just a standard practice. Engle-Granger test showed a clear result: MSTR and Bitcoin price levels (log prices) are not cointegrated. In other words, there is no long-term relationship that would statistically attach Strategy value to Bitcoin price. Quite important if you were thinking about MSTR as a Bitcoin replacement. The short-term relationship is strong. Model showed that Strategy has a high and quite stable beta coefficient relative to Bitcoin - on average, 1.36. Rolling window analysis proved that this beta is not random. Variation is relatively small, but the relation remains consistent in the short term. Volatility analysis, for which I used GARCH (1,1), also standard for investments, showed very important behavior - high volatility persistence (around 0.97). In practice this means that volatility in Strategy stock tends to stay for a long time. Quantile regressions showed that beta is very high in bear or bull regimes, and that means that MSTR is not safe against Bitcoin shocks - the leverage works symmetrically. So, what does it show us? The model showed that the stock has a lot of risks. This can be seen in the Q4 2025 results. First, lack of cointegration means that Strategy is not a Bitcoin follower, while it might seem like it from the chart above. Why? Because the company is actively changing its capital structure by issuing new shares and preferred capital (for example, STRC), with a goal to buy more Bitcoin. Which detaches it from long-term Bitcoin relations. Secondly, high volatility persistence is showing exact market reality. We can see from their latest earnings that Bitcoin price shocks not only affect valuation as share prices start following, but also increase stress for the company. They have approximately $800 million in annual interest and preferred dividend obligations. This sum is made of interest payments for convertible bonds and preferred stock dividends, which were issued to finance Bitcoin purchases. These costs are fixed and do not depend on BTC price, so when crypto starts having high swings, it just increases financial stress. Finally, NAV premium is gone; the market stopped paying " Saylor premium " and started pricing in dilution and structural risks. All in all, the results prove that Strategy today is not a software company but a high-beta Bitcoin experiment in real time. Authors Model, Canva Summary Strategy is not a software company anymore - it is a leveraged Bitcoin structure with additional debt, share issuance, and management risks. A statistically stable long-term relationship with Bitcoin does not exist, but a short-term one is affecting the company through high beta and volatility. For those who believe that if BTC is going to go up, so will MSTR, the numbers tell a different story; it is not a miner that follows gold prices, it is a structurally difficult company. If you hold this for 5 years thinking it's Bitcoin, the math says you will drift away from the asset. Q4 results proved that volatility will affect finances really hard, NAV premium is gone, and the market is trying to price in potential dilution and financial stress. I think that at this point buying BTC is safer than investing in MSTR. Even while the stock is being traded at NAV, Strategy has strong negative risk characteristics, in my opinion, stronger than buying Bitcoin. Investors are exposed to more leverage, refinancing risk, and potential additional new share issuance, plus let's add volatility. My rating is a strong sell. It is not worth risking for the hype.
